From Zealous Defense To Zealous Prodding: Ketanji’s Questions Keep Counsel On Their Toes

From Zealous Defense To Zealous Prodding: Ketanji’s Questions Keep Counsel On Their Toes


Senate Holds Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings For Ketanji Brown Jackson

(Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)

Since the start of her first term as a Supreme Court Justice, Justice Jackson has been under high scrutiny.

I wouldn’t be too worried about her though — it is definitely going both ways. Not too long ago she made headlines for her insistence on historical accuracy when interpreting the 14th Amendment and she hasn’t let up since.

While I know that lawyers are generally allergic to numbers greater than 13, a numerical breakdown of how often the Justices are speaking feels appropriate.

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has outpaced her colleagues in questioning while participating in her first oral arguments on the high court.

After eight arguments, Jackson had spoken more than 11,000 words, compared to nearly 5,500 words spoken by the next talkative justice so far this term, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, according to statistics by Adam Feldman of Empirical SCOTUS.

To put this in visual terms, here’s one graph from Feldman’s article:

Screen Shot 2022-10-18 at 1.56.15 PM

Maybe Justice Ginsburg was on to something when she quipped about having an all female Supreme Court. I would much rather have a sense for the gears turning in justices’ heads by hearing the questions they pose to council than blank stares that make you wonder if they’ve managed to fall asleep with their eyes open again. While it is interesting to note the frequency of Brown Jackson’s clarifying (and pointed) questing, who knows how things would have been a couple terms ago?

The Washington Post and the New York Times, along with Bloomberg Law, noted that oral arguments are getting longer, which makes comparisons more difficult.

The longer arguments are due to a new hybrid procedure that involves free-for-all questioning combined with a format in which each justice gets a turn. “Arguments that once ended promptly after an hour now routinely go much longer, sometimes more than twice that,” the Washington Post reports.

As the Court continues to hear cases, I am sure that Justice Jackson will continue to ask the real questions that get to the heart of the legal issues of our time. What limits, if any, may states place on the apparent absolute right to personal gun ownership? What remains of the Establishment Clause? Why won’t my ex text me back? I hope that these questions, and more, will be answered sooner rather than later.

Justice Jackson Has Dominated SCOTUS Oral Arguments, Statistics Show [ABA Journal]


Chris Williams became a social media manager and assistant editor for Above the Law in June 2021. Prior to joining the staff, he moonlighted as a minor Memelord™ in the Facebook group Law School Memes for Edgy T14s.  He endured Missouri long enough to graduate from Washington University in St. Louis School of Law. He is a former boatbuilder who cannot swim, a published author on critical race theory, philosophy, and humor, and has a love for cycling that occasionally annoys his peers. You can reach him by email at [email protected] and by tweet at @WritesForRent.





Source link

administrators

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *